The Anti-Angle.

Much ado about noting[!]

WOE-Wae:

War on executives / War against evidence.

Romney charges Obama with "real war upon women".

Hides behind women against women.

CSM: Rosen: “What you have is Mitt Romney running around the country, saying, 'Well, you know, my wife tells me that what women really care about are economic issues, and when I listen to my wife, that’s what I’m hearing.' Guess what? His wife has actually never worked a day in her life. She’s never really dealt with the kinds of economic issues that a majority of the women in this country are facing, in terms of how do we feed our kids, how do we send them to school, and why do we worry about their future.”

CSM: "It's clear from the context that Rosen wasn't criticizing Ann Romney for staying home. She was criticizing the Romney campaign for presenting Ann Romney as an expert on the economic concerns of women, when Romney's own economic circumstances (including the fact that she was able to stay home with all five of her sons) are not those that most women have."

MSNBC: The Last Word?

CNN: Rosen Apologizes !!!!!

Republicans better clean up their act or get out of the kitchen.

[Title is reference to Sharron Angle and her "press" encounters. Hilary Rosen used an inconvenient sentence unless it is about getting coverage. As opposed to Try Angle.]

Last Word: Banana Split? Mother's Day. Mitt Gap. Romney Rule? Florida v. Zimmerman.

The Ed Show: Biden Interview, N. Korea, GOP War on Women, Obama "hard work", Florida v.Zimmerman, Walker, Attack or Temp Late?

Rachel Maddow: Strikes Metaphor.

Welcome to the Machine

Not to drive this home, but...

here we go [!]

The altruism of WAR.

Speaking of Ge Oh Me Try

or plane (and not so plane) English...
here is a base of hope, a try angle of diplomacy(Robert Naiman)[UPDATE]:

The New York Times reported yesterday that the US says it does not want to call for Mubarak to step down because 1) it fears losing all leverage with Mubarak 2) it fears creating a power vacuum in Egypt 3) it wants to avoid the perception that the US was "once again" engineering the ouster of a Middle East leader.
Regardless of whether one believes that these stated reasons are the full story, or whether they are also a cover for other US motivations - the Times acknowledges that the administration's "restraint" is also driven by lack of enthusiasm for "dealing with an Egypt without Mubarak" - these are the stated reasons of the US for not responding to the protesters' call.
But publicly and privately backing the opposition parties' call for negotiations would not, on the face of it, trigger any of the stated US objections. It is a very modest demand, totally consistent with previous US statements, which would not plausibly lead to "losing all leverage" with Mubarak; it would not create a "power vacuum"; it would not reasonably lead to a perception that the US was
"engineering" Mubarak's ouster. On the contrary: the US would be raising the profile of a particular proposal for negotiations as a way out of the crisis, and increasing pressure on the Egyptian government to respond to it.

Hope may not be too strong a word for what is not really a base, but a path. The point is that diplomacy must recognize the points and the angles to be effective.

Speaking of angles:

YES! Do not pick on Social Security as part of the debt picture, shore it up. In fact, lowering the retirement age, increasing the cap for contributions, catching it up with inflation would actually improve the debt picture, by impacting federal receipts. (not from Social Security but in income tax on the improved income.) Thank Senator Reid

I may need to take another angle on my comment: Big picture, poor segue, right note. My social security tangent is less than clear in economic or accounting terms, but the issue of State budgets, and the impact of unfunded retirement and health plans is a similar complex of factors that angle back to the nature of our frackin' troubles.

[Footnote * on embedded nature.]

* not (...embedded that is.)

Total eclipse of the

gut?
FuN[?]

9-26-12
President Obama mentioned a time warp.
Clinton mentioned arithmatic.
Not to leave it on a try angle, but...
UN Speech,*** 
filed to read*.

The Cycle** was particularly good yesterday.

* more with the apology mitt-flop
** not exactly

 [***There is no violence that justifies mindless speech. The only thing to fear is understanding itself. To Romney they are not bumps in the road, but that is what they are when you aren't kicking a can down the road.]

[ SatIre of a Mockery: Simone Says (?)]

*** 9-27-12  Just to be clear, there are no quotation marks in the 1st  bracketed['s]  while the satire in the 2nd broke later.  I am putting a spin on President Obama's point about free speech verses[!]
"terror".  While Roger Simone puts a spin on "free speech" and the Romney/Ryan campaign.  Not to mention Dansing Bernstein. 

[!]= (sic) or pun on versus or verse us cycle.(OK... it evolved.)

FN(Footnotes) not (fn): from the top
FB: Turn Around Bright Eyes
(YouTube): unembedded from FB
(Bloomberg unembedded)
try: The Fed’s Best Rationale for QE3
angle: Be Smart, Not Just Tough, in the Middle East
but: did Obama stand up?(under construction)

Cautious Black Friday!!!!

There are no bad ideas, only bad reactions.* 
(re:congress & fiscal cliff)
[] Retro-Try-Angle [!]


* still meaning to get in touch with my Strunk & White.

(fn)

[!]= sarcasm notation & (b.s.) Share + n + angle

Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!

Not to step in political correctness but he seems** to be whining about whining, or blaming about blame.  But when it comes to change, it should not apply to history.***  You cannot expect 3 years to let you forget* the prior 8 or 30.

* tangent of sorts
** original trigger (tba)
*** combo */**

[Not to fulfill a Geo Me Try but there is something about the try angle and the share 'n angle, not to mention voodoo math. Not to mention Popeyes?]
[Not to mention coffee grounds on the turd blossom as if there was not enough calm post.]

Note: last two links are post post but are germ in8 two[!]
(calm post: Steele/Obama)

Loose Lips and Sinking Metaphors

Footnotes PAGE Under Construction:

1-25-12

From loose lips to sinking ships. The Last Word hits the nail on the arc. Actually that is not the nail, but lip schtick, was on the horizon. It regards the history of the Republican Taxpolicy visa-vi debt policy. Not to mention Paw-lenty of Pie and Metaphor On.

1-26-12 [spin off of above...]

On the horizon, from G.H.W. Bush's "read my lips" to Bruce Bartlett's point: "1990 is the last time you had a leading Republican figure or President who cared about the deficit..." It is ironic he points out that the US is under the lowest tax burden in history compared to GDP.

More on Pit Bullies, in con text. Not that the gap in context is part of the con text, but the in con text(links) provide tripartite context**. In less embedded prose, bully for the Clemons piece, the Austrian pitting of Obama/Brewer, in relation to the Bush years, Iran con, and economics texting. While the final con text is the Standard and Pours[!] of the Neo-perspectivism on flip-flop and nuance. One try angle, another try angle. Not to call an odd man out, nor 4wo***man, but under the con I(above)ran a Just Foreign Policy sample, that takes a look at the dynamics of diplomacy. *

* not to be fair and balanced, nor brush off or in women,

the last three links reference; Hillary Clinton, Joan Walsh and Susan Rice.

** there by allowing 3 links to follow the pit bullies dynamics (2+3=5)

*** not to con grew an arc

(I plead the 5th in regard to irony[!])

[1-27-12: Related irony or booked signing?]

< previous post >

Mitt's BO*Son

Not to get too physicsCal,
but the Mitt Flop of mass theory is Political.
Is it the Tetrahedron of Won't or Wont?

Share ’N Angle
Issa Coverup Committee
Cain TV
Rance Priebus


The Devo Incar-n8?

You do the math.
Or Revoo due the math !

Why is Raw Money a uniter not a divider, because they can't do the math. 
[Ctrl F Intents Post B.S.]

* past particle pun

[7-10-12 Pardon my pun getting lost in the physics, boss. 
Speaking of bookin'** or book ends.***]

 ** tan gent (or ge oh me try***)
*** not gun a go there
[but Kan'T : A Brief Incite?]
[I may have smoothed the edges of my pairaGone.]
[Speaking of NOW: DWS "Class Act" What about capital gains? People v. R-Money. (Share 'n Angle v. Robbin' Hood)  Those poor 1,2,3%!]
[NTM: Jansing &Co.][CW: Caricature Writer @DWS.cc]
[P. S.]

Try Angle

Here are a few pieces that intersect.
Re-Rights,
Checks,
And Balances. [^^^]

How? Well, we have the Judiary, Congress, and the Executive perspectives.
The bottom line is account ability. Yes, that is two words under three branches.
We have the accounting of Bush v. Gore, trickle down, and the slippery slope. Juctices can't count, economics does, and they all matter. I will try not fall into the trap of the previous post with technical difficulties arising from the burden of
tangents and links, or whatever the problem*** is, but it is a matter of looking back** at where we were and how we got there, with Bush the Decider, the current economic climate of understanding Trickle-Down and Slippery-Slopes, and the Executive we are lucky to have in the face of mythical* obstructionism and obfuscation. In fact, again I have only read the first and glanced a bit at the others but they are almost a protractor or other instrument of our graphic nature and the geometry of purpose that some have. i.e. It was not my original intent but maybe there is some intelligent design, in that it is about Re-Writing our social architecture. Re-writing checks and balances, economics is the bottomline and whether there is Bane or Change, and I don't mean Bain or Boehner.

* mythical: as in monstrously huge if not fantastical.
** well they did arise so there! I mean here:
and see Lord of markets,
and values politics. Economics is not without politics and values.***

*** "convenient" link see placement(^) of asterisk "the problem" re: positive/normative "dispute" or die-manics of dynamics.

(^) (more ttdl: footnote search own comment(^^) re: economics being engineering. ...?)

(^^) [3-13-12 update: my ttdl(temp tech difficulty linking) is now corrected, also found my comments on economics being a field of social engineering. Featured caricature? Herbert Spencer. ALSO RE : Politics ]

[ Unrelated: if war were not related to economics.(NFRY) Also too bad.]

[^^^ Tag tomorrow : From the original Try Angle we have the 3 branches as we navigate the world of economics and power relations.]

"Are you ready for..."

[SUPER BOWL SUNDAY 2-6-11 SEE NOTE BELOW]some football?
'nuff chit chat? But Pre-Fox:
Not to be fair and balanced
or a try angle.

.A.....B.
.....C....

Or RT Angle,

.D
.
.E.......F...Or D'Nile

Speaking of Picks:
I must find the original but here is another take.

[The geometry above needs some work, but I got this down just before the fine tribute by the NFL to our troops.]
[Ah heck I will have to redo the the whole Ge Oh Me Try bit, but here's to a good game.]
Two Teams of the People![Update]
[ORIGINAL POST ON SUPER BOWL SUNDAY, 2-6-11 2:19 PM PST
Repositioned 2-7-11]
[More on game results.]
[NOTE: Sparsity of comment -or-effects regarding A thru F.]

Obtuseness?

Robert Reich asks why are Democrats voting for Reaganomics?
Paul Craig Roberts suggests another spin on Reaganomics.
Is it the obtuseness of stagflation/inflation?
Is that like growing the pie, while each piece gets smaller?
No, it is like the pie not growing while costs do, and jobs go to pieces. Whew, I think I cut that close to home. But I do think that several of their points do intersect (actually lines do, but at points) but there could be another angle or perspective needed in the back and forth. Enough ge oh me trick ally pointed puns. It may take a third econonomic perspective or formulae to alter the give and take. At least it is not just about supply and demand, but employment and progress. But for whom?
[I did not mean to kill two birds with one stone, but yes I am often obtuse or have a cute angle on things. I may often have too big a picture(stone) or skip from one to another perspective(bird). But this toss is back to the concept of not all things being equal. Not just taxes, but debt and spending, in regards to alternate pies, perspectives or form you lie.]
[Potential Star Chamber? The other four points.]
[Breaking, a cuteness.]

But for Angle

It looks like Senator Harry Reid has pulled it out.
But for Angle we might have a different story.
But(t)* for the people?

"Do not hold the delusion that your advancements are accomplished by crushing others." Cicero

But for the T*, who knows?
*T 4 three?(Really?)...Really? (Not a Tangent)

Clown Car A or B?

Or C ? 

Bane or Change?

Don't call them stupid!
It only adds to their lip schtick!
aka Akin to Jindal. 
let alone books Scarlet Badge of Ivanhoe or cam a lot?

We need a poll asking which clown car are you for?
Obama Clinton Warren Sanders or Bush, McCain, Romney, Palin, Paul, Walker et al?
Camel under tent and circling your cats, and the spectral meta~for! (or lemma-4)
Still / ~ / going. 

[Daily KOS]

5-27-15 The Try Angle File. (NFRY label)
5-28-15 Not so circular file.  Nor Try Angle [!]
[Thomas Roberts: Bush/Rubio~Putin]
Let alone NOW w/ Chimp See, Chimp sue? Let alone LIBtard HeGel?

FN/FP erization?

11-14-14 platonics(b.s.), co-op(T)ed, where T= "A Deeper Mess Age." of (fp3-erization)
no f 'n p4. where p3= axis of good(ow) ? 'n p4~erization ~> Rat Races Van Mices? ,(fp), (fp), Un-Social Darwinism. , Try Angle , (mee) [axis of good : Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope , I.Q.* (draft) , Red Bull... ]

Try Angle Nation

RSN: cant or

I, J, K street?

Gender Clash
More Mon knee? TP

O W [?]  ...

(tout court [!])  6-25-14
Let alone Green's function 4yeah or phoyer, let alone faux-yer. Bin go.
Ruff FP:
orbit - Anachronism , Scratch That...
"many body" not exactly , hertz
Pars'n any:  A.  Thumbs/GOP and OWS , B. Anachronism , C. Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?, D. A Tail of Caution , E. I Told You So., F. Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (re:legend - sc)

Ideology

The perspective one has of society's creation and one's role in it.***

Not* Exactly[!]

[Ideology and Iowa are a lot like the eye of the needle or camel.(no pun)]

[Perspective: to be processed later more or less...[!]
Speaking of ant or fable TV. Democrats cannot afford to have distractions or liars, just because "the Right" does it. Speaking of irrelative**: ant:Anthony, Ed:Rush,(or Beck Or Reck) Whiner:BaneOr, silver lining:golden rule, objective/subjective ]

* iOWa, iRreleFont? Rachel Maddow discusses the "small i" people. But then, eye had not seen her comments.

** something about relative in regards to the differences in ideologies and personalities on spectrum ofor loopiness on the left or right.

***[Media(sources) a side: wMD: I may go on or take hiatus but the bottomline is the top line is mine. i.e. I have only begun the Mike Cormack book, and I am not quoting it. Ibid this bracket.(Thanks to truthout.org for this last crack, not the book]

[!]Hi Ate Us, interesting Try Angle or Segue(way)[]. Or Tr(eye)i Pod?
A.B.C.D...

Reel Ledership

Unknown candidate more favorable than Obama.
Obama leading over known persons.

Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding!
2000th post.
(Counting 90 in draft, that is.)
 
Unfortunately, the blog format has evolved, and needs getting used to.
In fact, it seemed to evolve mid-post, as I managed to get in a bottom link here, but cannot not locate that process going forward or even in edit format.  


THIS just as I had declared MISSION IMPOSSIBLE, I mean, ACCOMPLISHED[!]
And just as I had reached a pinnacle of a point, (That was redundant, or was it?) {one of the the new features}
the irony* of Mission Accomplished, let alone leadership. (David Sirota and the Star Chamber)

NOW with** ALEX WAGNER,
But earlier with Jansing & Co.
And earlier with Ed Schultz and Nancy Pelosi.

BUT HERE IS part of the Mission CON *** TEXT,
and UNDERSTANDING "Who-w-Aww!"

* nails it:"Battle Him of the Republic".
let "alone" "leadership"
** or rather not yet with Alex Wagner
(and before I forget, it is the "pretty please" hyperbola of Romney, and the childish cycle.)
*** see CON 5 minutes on.
[Note Labels and comments(2),'n  Odd need.]

[The Alex Wagner link HERE.]
[Speaking of Dawn Key Ody]
[Late Possible Link inserted, let alone Try Angle.]

[Final note in reverence to Christopher Hitchens, and reference to Bashir and Ratigan. (oops)]
[accidental tangent found error in "Final" link/search/pun]
Mean[!]while: Ratigan has a panel on "Straight Talk" where Mission Accomplished applies to the popularity of congress.  With Republicans in charge of the House and having record filibusters,(meaning a minority has the responsibility in the Senate), their schtick is gridlock, not progress or compromise, let alone all truism. These are my prose not the panel's or guest's, but it can certainly be said that for the Republican goal of making sure there is a one term president by passing the buck, it could be mission accomplished.  But that hits the nail on the head with my lede (and the source) of Reel Ledership[!]. 

9-13-13 Jansen and Co label corrected(added).

Try Lemmings

Trigger No Metrics!

If the pen is mightier than the sword, the keyboard is a bacteria*. 

* I will refrain from second guessing, wikipeddling or digging up my Genetics textbook. (It is close enough for government work.)

[Note: saved in draft as time stamped, but released @12:50 PM unedited**, linked or labeled.]
** not to drag lemmings in, only the "Political Calculus" or "cultural calculus" and share n' angle'n.

Charlotte's Web

Share 'n Angle*

* montage of sorts [FP1]

Low4est

As opposed to Hi8us or A3?

a1.  My roots are Scandinavian, French, 'n French-Canadian.
a2.  I won't get into my branches or algorithms.
b4. I tan gent or share 'n angle, my primary school was Sherwood Forest. 
c4. Presage of King County.
Sea 1st link.

The missing link?
[The spin* or ge oh me tricks of logos. {re-image} Politics, Economics, Hume...or us.]

* link added 4-13-14 (de-image) #- / -[!]
[4-14-14: ?   Objective Good ? ! ]
[Hume or ...  ?]
4-15-14 [Hume or?]

Snooze Alarm

Something about Romney and...
(T M I)

These are not actually the stuff of dreams or my AM snoozing, but if President Obama were half as frightening as the right would have him, the left and the middle would be more content.***

[Not Exactly]

Dirty Harry and Fake My Day:  Rachel Maddow nails Romney on lastest ad that*...

...can't be put into words.   Maybe** a Mitt Sand Witch or Which.  Well... three words.  Frackin', fudgin', in-F-able!  Or goose the gander.  I will hold off on the links for now.  One word is waver, or "cul de sac" of politics.  Another is "running".  For what?(Or from...)  Romney wavers on wavers and shoots Romneyfair or care in the foot.  How high is the cow pie?  Or maybe the real word is "works". The right implication is that Romney and the Federal Government would dictate what works.  Could he trickle down any philosophy more?  The pour won per cent[!]

* link and continued sentence 8-8-12
**image/cartoons

***

[Up Date: Tetra Heed Run ? Or Try Angle ?]

 NOTE: Charts of Sorts.